Father Andrew Lawrence
BANGKOK: The storm which erupted after a High Court ruled that the national Catholic weekly “Herald” was allowed to use the word “Allah” saw eight churches and one Christian institution in the country attacked.
A Sikh temple and a mosque were also targeted. Such attacks are unprecedented in Malaysian history and it has left the country in crisis.
There are nevertheless signs of hope with a tremendous outpouring of sympathy by Muslims and others after the incidents.
But let’s first look at the “Herald” itself and its influence in the country.
The first thing to note is that it is extremely difficult for a Muslim to get hold of a copy of the “Herald” due to the government’s strict publishing laws. The paper is only sold at Catholic churches and has a circulation of just 13,000-14,000 among the country’s 900,000 Catholics.
The country’s laws against proselytizing Muslims strongly discourage any Catholic from giving a copy of the “Herald” to his or her Muslim friend or neighbor.
Second, English is the main language used in the publication. There are small sections in Malay, Chinese and Tamil. The “Herald” wants to be able to resume using the word “Allah” only in its Malay section.
Use of ‘Allah’This leads to another pertinent question: Who are the Christians who use the word “Allah?”
Christians who worship in English, Chinese or Tamil would never use “Allah” for God — only Malay-speaking Christians use this term. They are mainly the indigenous peoples of the eastern states of Sabah and Sarawak on Borneo island, although many work or study in western or peninsular Malaysia, and many Catholic churches there conduct Malay-language Masses to serve them.
The heated debate following the court ruling has generally missed these points.
Even some Christians have called for their fellow Christians to drop using the word “Allah” for the sake of national peace and harmony, not being aware that East Malaysian Christians have been using this word for more than 100 years.
Politically orchestrated?Some Muslims have always had a strong suspicion that Christians are out to convert them and that this whole “Allah” issue is just one attempt to confuse them. They are unaware that East Malaysian Christians are at home with the word.
Many Malaysians, however, see the whole issue as being politically orchestrated and a way of using Muslims’ sensitivities to gain votes.
This alleged politicization, ironically, has led to new efforts by both sides to reach out to one another.
More than 100 civil society groups representing a spectrum of Malaysian society have come forward to condemn the church attacks. Church leaders have called on all Christians not to react but to respond with love, forgiveness and prayer, while Muslims have volunteered to help patrol churches.
Individual Muslims have also shown solidarity with Christians through Facebook.
Possible outcomeBut the most positive outcome may be the creation of a new culture of interreligious dialogue in the country, something that has generally been considered “too sensitive.”
Many Muslim groups including the opposition Islamic party have expressed readiness to meet and talk with Christian leaders, and also called for interfaith councils to discuss and resolve interreligious issues.
A public interreligious forum in Kuala Lumpur on Jan. 11 entitled “Allah: Whose is it?” attracted 1,000 people of various religions. Most of the speakers were Muslim scholars. Media reported the discussion was calm despite divergent viewpoints.
A Muslim scholar who spoke at the forum told me that dialogue must continue even though we often have to “agree to disagree.”
Such dialogue cannot come at a better time, when such a huge failure in communication is apparent.
Finally, another outcome is that the indigenous Christians of East Malaysia are beginning to assert their right to worship in the way they have always done. Media reported them stating that though both they and their Muslim neighbors use “Allah,” there has never been a problem.
The East Malaysian Christians who are bumiputra (sons of the soil), like Malay-Muslims, may be the determining factor in how this issue turns out in the end.
Courtesy: UCAN
Published By Mohammad Saidin
Dear the Catholic Observer: Please do NOT hide the facts about Trinity referring to 3 persons as proven in quotations below:
"Bible Dictionary
Trinity
a word not found in sc
ripture, but used to express the doctrine of the unity of God as subsisting in three distinct Persons. This word is derived from the Gr. trias, first used by Theophilus (A.D. 168-183), or from the Lat. trinitas, first used by Tertullian (A.D. 220), to express this doctrine. The propositions involved in the doctrine are these: 1. That God is one, and that there is but one God (Deut. 6:4; 1 Kings 8:60; Isa. 44:6; Mark 12:29, 32; John 10:30). 2. That the Father is a distinct divine Person (hypostasis, subsistentia, persona, suppositum intellectuale), distinct from the Son and the Holy Spirit. 3. That Jesus Christ was truly God, and yet was a Person distinct from the Father and the Holy Spirit. 4. That the Holy Spirit is also a distinct divine Person.
Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary
Cite This Source"
The 'Word of Allah'; that is 'Be' is definitely NOT exclusive to Jesus only, because anything that exists is created by Allah as in Surah 3:47 "When He has decreed something, He says to it only 'Be' and 'it is'."
Jesus as 'Ruhullah' means as 'Spirit created by Allah' NOT as Spirit part of Allah. In fact, we are also spirits created by Allah. Therefore, nothing in the Quran which is the Word of Allah implies that Jesus is divine or the Son of God. Besides, there is no plurality in unity from the Quran UNLIKE in the Bible, like the Trinity as defined and quoted from the Bible Dictionary above. See! It is now clear that the Trinity represents 3 distinct (different) persons as 3 Gods and NOT one person as one God. Use your basic mathematical skill in calculating 1+1+1=3 NOT 1. On the other hand, 1x1x1=1 cannot be used for the Trinity, because clearly the 3 persons are NOT like 3 identical triplets having the same, exact fingeprints. So, the key point here is for you the Catholic Observer to keep up with your constitutional rights for freedom of worship without invoking 'Allah', since you already know for a fact that your church prayers and worship services are still valid and acceptable without using the kalimah 'Allah' at all, just like using the terms 'God' and 'Lord' in New York here for church prayers and worship services are still valid and acceptable without invoking 'Allah' at all, meaning that you the Catholic Observer as non-Arabic speaking Trinitarians can more conveniently use 'Tuhan Bapa' and 'Dewata Yesus Kristus' or preferably 'Elohim Bapa' and 'Theos Yesus Kristus' as out of respect for your Old Testament and New Testament which were first discovered by scriptural scholars and archeological researchers to have been written in Hebrew and Greek, respectively. Furthermore, Trinitarians are UNLIKE Muslims who must invoke 'Allah' for prayers to be valid and acceptable. So, tiada perlu nak mengada-gada lagi sampai ke courtlah. Sportinglah sikit dan janganlah sampai mengada-gada hendak gunakan kalimah 'Allah' yang you tidak perlukan sama-sekali in Trinity.
Published By TheCatholic Observer
The Trinity of Christianity is truly representative of the Mind of God (commonly referred to as God the Father), His Thoughts, (commonly referred to as God the Holy Spirit) and His Word (commonly referred to as God the Son). In the Quran Jesus is called "a Word from God": Behold! the angels said: "O Mary! God giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him; his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honor in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to God; " (Surah 3, Al-i-'Imran, verse 45),This is why Islamic tradition calls Jesus "Ruhullah", that means "Spirit of Allah". Neither the Spirit of Allah (the Thoughts) nor the Word (the mind expressed) of Him can have been created since whatever proceeds from God Himself is part of Him and must therefore have existed eternally. If God was without Mind at any time He would not be God; or if he was without Thoughts at any time He would cease to be the Almighty One which is impossible! Muslim theology confirms this belief by stating that the Quran is uncreated and has existed in eternity with God. There again we find plurality within unity, something that is other then God but it is at the same time one with God. please think out of the circle, please don't set your mind that Trinity is refer to 3 person. God did a wonderful things, without we understand it. You should know that.
Published By Mohammad Saidin
Dear the Catholic Observer: You know for a fact that your triune God or the Trinity itself as 3 in 1 and vice-versa is NOT 1x1x1 because the 3 persons in Trinity are NOT identical triplets with the exact, same fingerprints, right? If it is NOT so, then why did God the Son Jesus pray to God the Father, but God the Father never prayed to God the Son? If each of the 3 persons in Trinity is God that constitutes one God or one person instead of 3 Gods or 3 distinct (dfferent) persons as claimed by Christians or preferably Trinitarians who worship one God in Trinity, then it becomes NOT only confusing but also gibberish, right? I therefore challenge you the Catholic Observer to explain your concept of the Trinity without any confusion here. Would you the Catholic Observer be glad to accept my challenge here?
Published By TheCatholic Observer
The Federal Government should be smart to hold inter religious dialogue immediately if it still wanted the support of Christians voters from Sabah & Sarawak. If the government do not want to accept the truth that Christians in both the East Malaysian States have been using Allah and Tuhan to denote God and Lord for more then 100 years, then they have a moral duty to inform the muslims in Peninsular of this truth that Christians have used the word century ago and Muslims and Christians there have no problem or are anything confused. No noe is confused,so why must the Muslims in Peninsular be confused?