Tengku Razaleigh says Umno’s response to the ‘Allah’ controversy is ‘short of leadership and moral fibre’.
By Leslie Lau
KUALA LUMPUR: Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah lashed out at Umno today over its strident position on the “Allah” controversy, pointing out that the party was bent on fanning communal sentiment and digging itself into an intolerant hardline position with no parallel in the Muslim world.
He also suggested that racially-based parties should no longer be allowed to contest elections in multiracial Malaysia.
Speaking in Singapore today at the ISEAS regional outlook forum, his scathing remarks comes as Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak shored up Umno and the government’s position over the Allah controversy by backing the right of Muslim groups to hold a public demonstration tomorrow.
Umno and a number of Muslim NGOs have been in an uproar over the recent High Court ruling allowing the Catholic church’s Herald newspaper to use the word “Allah” to refer to God in its Bahasa Malaysia section.
The government has filed an appeal against the ruling and yesterday it won a stay of execution.
The Islamist PAS, however, has backed the court’s ruling by pointing out that the word “Allah” can be used by those of the Abrahamic faiths — Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
Tengku Razaleigh suggested today that the rejection of Umno and the Barisan Nasional (BN) communal politics model by large swathes of voters in Election 2008 had led the Malay nationalist party to pursue racial issues more stridently.
“They think this will shore up their ’base’. They are mistaken about the nature of that base. As they do so, they become more extreme and out of touch with ordinary voters of every race and religion whose major concerns are not racial or religious identity but matters such as corruption, security, the economy and education.”
He cited as an example the “Allah” controversy.
“In a milestone moment, PAS, the Islamic party, is holding onto the more plural and moderate position while Umno is digging itself into an intolerant hard-line position that has no parallel that I know of in the Muslim world.
“Umno is fanning communal sentiment, and the government it leads is taking up policy lines based on ‘sensitivities’ rather than principle. The issue appears to be more about racial sentiment than religious, let alone constitutional principles,” he said in his luncheon address.
He said Umno’s response to the “Allah” controversy was “short of leadership and moral fibre.”
Tengku Razaleigh’s latest attack on Umno and the government is not likely to go down well with the hardline conservatives in his party.
But the Umno veteran has been unrelenting in his call for reforms in Umno. Recently, he also slammed the BN government’s position in refusing to give oil royalties to Kelantan, which is ruled by PAS.
On the “Allah” issue, the former Finance Minister is particularly scathing in his remarks.
“Sensitivities is the favoured resort of the gutter politician. With it he raises a mob, fans its resentment and helps it discover a growing list of other sensitivities. This is a road to ruin. A nation is made up of citizens bound by a shared conception of justice and not of mobs extracting satisfaction for politicised emotional states,” he said.
Tengku Razaleigh said that when the government began speaking the language of sensitivities, it was a mark of the country’s decline.
He said the controversy over the use of “Allah” should not be about managing sensitivities but about doing what was right.
“This is what government sounds like when a political system and its leadership have come unstuck from the rule of law. It goes from issue to issue, hostage to the brinksmanship of sensitivities. Small matters threaten to erupt into racial conflict.
“The government of a multiracial society that cannot rise above sentiment is clearly too weak or too self-interested to hold the country together. It has lost credibility and legitimacy. The regime is in crisis.”
Tengku Razaleigh said that while the prime minister had made what he called “helpful gestures” towards freeing up the economy and pursuing multiracial policies, Malaysia was still in need of fundamental reform.
He urged an overhaul of the political system to rule out racially exclusive parties from directly contesting elections; a restoration of the independence of the judiciary and the media; and an all-out war against graft.
Courtesy: TheMalaysianInsider
Published By Raj suhansa
Tolerance ONLY cames with right knowledge and training,experiencesand age or otherwise with sincere spiritual disciplines such as fasting,resisting temptations of the mind by observing abstinances of the bodily cravings so that the mind becomes weak and finally evaporates leaving the awareness of the self only to Be. Only when one has this experience even for a minute would he not do any thing to harm oneself or others as he realises the \"Awareness\" in his self as the same as in all living persons that he sees. Declaring one\'s being in any religion is a farce only when that experience is not felt in his self first.
Published By Raj suhansa
Dear Tengku, you have my vote. Your moderation in your views as a leader is superb Sir. A quote from a realised person of Mumbai says, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Put your awareness to work, not your mind. The mind is not the right instrument for this task. The timeless can be reached only by the timeless. Your body and your mind are born subject to time; only awareness is timeless, even in the Now. Awareness is ever there. It need not be realized. Open the shutter of the mind, and it will be flooded with light.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" Since the mind is a projection of this \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"awareness\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" and what ever name given or to be given for this state of being is not really the issue. Al-Quran at Surah 6-103 says \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" Sight perceives Him not, but He perceives men’s sights; for He is the subtle, the aware.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" Like wise the Keno Upanishad (cap.1-7) of ancient India similarly says, \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"That which cannot be perceived by the eye, but by which the eye is perceived—That alone know as Brahman and not that which people here worship.\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" There fore is a name of god does matter for a sincere seeker of god. Only by intuition one can realise this \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"god\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" experience which is in the \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Now\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" always. One must be alive to see, here, touch and so forth. How can this \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"god\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" be of the past or the future experience when it only happens when we are in the now. So disputes over this issue should only be done by the knowers of this experience and not the ignorant ones. So groups of people having agendas of their own as seen in the ancient times capitalise on the weaaknesses of the gullible to make their day or way to control the meek for their ends. Mere history alone doesn\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'t make us being alive. Something else that we do not waznt know is keeping us alive. We want to know everything of the out side and sadly we do not anything that happens below our skin, which is 100% ourselves. What difference it make? Being serious to know what happens is the self is the first step to know the unknowable or god. Leaders be reminded to seek the truth and give that knowledge of the self than to drag historical aspects of the only \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"god\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\" who gives clouds, rain, water, air, light, warmth, etc to humans, creatures and vegetations of this beautiful world.
Published By TheCatholic Observer
Yes, fully agreed with Tengku Li what he said. By the way the controlled media projected the issue of Allah seem to be onesided. I think people are not foolish to know who is making the most noise. Political party who seem to be fanning for sentiments from their followers to cause fear among the rakyat. Thsi issue can be easily settled by having dialogue between Chrstian and Muslim leaders on a round table talk. What Shafiq (A Muslim)commented is good and fair. The Christians should be allowed to use Allah for God in Bahasa Malaysia only and not to misuded it. That's so simple, yet these politicians are only taking advantage to show that they are the champion of Islam and Malay cause.
Published By Shafiq
Hye, Im a muslim. As I learned before, yes. You can use the word of Allah as long as you all not "misuse" it. Have a nice day. I do respect your religion. We are all Abrahamic - Jews, Muslims and Christians.