Losing the song in the singer

Often, when listening to someone singing live or on television, I close my eyes to try to hear the song so as not to let the singer’s performance get in the way of the song. A song can be lost in its performance; indeed, the performance can take over so that the song is replaced by the singer.

Jun 05, 2021

By Fr Ron Rolheiser
Often, when listening to someone singing live or  on television, I close my eyes to try to hear the song so as not to let the singer’s performance  get in the way of the song. A song can be lost in its performance; indeed, the performance can take over so that the song is replaced  by the singer.

When anyone is performing  live, be it on a stage, in a classroom, at a podium or in a pulpit, there will always be some combination of three things. The speaker will be trying to impress others  with his talent; he will be trying  to get a message across; and (consciously or unconsciously) he  will be trying to channel something true, good, and beautiful for  its own sake. Metaphorically, he  will be making love to himself,  making love to the audience, and  making love to the song.

It is the third component, making love to the song, which makes  for great art, great rhetoric, great  teaching, and great preaching.  Greatness sets itself apart here because what comes through is “the  song” rather than the singer, the  message rather than the messenger, and the performer’s empathy  rather than his ego. The audience  then is drawn to the song rather  than to the singer. Good singers  draw people to the music rather  than to themselves; good teachers  draw students to truth and learning rather than to themselves;  good artists draw people to beauty  rather than to adulation, and good  preachers draw their congregations to God rather than to praise  of themselves.

Admittedly, this isn’t easy to do. We are all human, so is our audience. No audience respects you unless you do show some  talent, creativity and intelligence.There’s always an unspoken pressure on the singer, the speaker, the teacher, and the preacher, both from within and from without. From within: I don’t want to disappoint! I don’t want to look bad! I need to stand out! I need to show them something special! From without, from the audience: What  have you got! Show us something! Are you worth my attention? Are you bright? Are you boring? Only the most mature person can be  free of these pressures.Thus, the song easily gets lost in the singer, the message in the messenger, the teaching in the teacher, and the  message of God in the personality of the preacher.

As a teacher, preacher and writer, I admit my own long struggle  with this. When you first start  teaching, you had better impress  your students or you won’t have their attention or respect for long. The same with preaching. The congregation is always sizing you up, and you had better measure up  or no one will be listening to you. 

Moreover, unless you have an exceptionally strong self-image, you will be a perennial prisoner of your own insecurities. Nobody wants to look bad, stupid, uninformed, or come across as talentless. Everyone wants to look  good. Moreover, not least, there is  still your ego (and its power  can never be underestimated). It  wants to draw the attention and the admiration to itself rather than to what is true, good and beautiful. There is always the temptation for the messenger to be more concerned about impressing others than about having the message come through in purity and truth. The subtle, but powerful, temptation inside every singer, teacher, speaker, preacher or writer, is to draw people to themselves rather  than to the truth and beauty they are trying to channel.

I struggle with this in every  class I teach, every article or book I write, and every time I preside at liturgy. Nevertheless, I make no apologies for this. It is the innate  struggle in all creative effort. Are we trying to draw people to ourselves, or are we trying to draw them to truth, to beauty, to God? When I teach a class, how much of my preparation and energy is motivated by a genuine concern for the students and how much is motivated by my need  to look good, to impress, to have a reputation as a good teacher? When I write an article or a book, am I really trying to bring insight  and understanding to others or am I thinking of my status as a writer? When I preside at Mass  and preach is my real motivation to channel a sacred ritual in a manner that my own personality doesn’t get in the way? Is it to  lead people into community with  each other and to decrease myself so Christ can increase? 

There is no simple answer to  those questions because there can’t be. Our motivation is always less than fully pure. Moreover, we are not meant to be robots  without personalities. Our unique  personalities and talents were given by God precisely as gifts to  be used for others. Still, there’s a clear warning sign. When the focus of the audience is more on our personalities than on the song, we  are probably making love more to  ourselves and our admirers than  to the song.

Total Comments:0